Illinois Report Card 2025-2026
  • ISBE Data Library
  • Take the Survey
  • Español
  • Help/FAQ
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. MANHATTAN JR HIGH SCHOOL
  3. Students
  4. Student Attendance

Accountability in the Illinois School Report Card

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) requires every state to measure school performance, establish long-term goals for student outcomes, and identify schools that need additional support. Illinois' accountability system, Profiles of Performance, brings together multiple measures of student outcomes, progress, engagement, and school experience while keeping the individual measures visible.

Each school receives an annual Profile of Performance. The profile is intended to provide clear information about school performance and serve as a starting point for continuous improvement.

Illinois uses six accountability indicators.

Core indicators form the foundation of the profile:

  • Composite Proficiency: English language arts, mathematics, and science
  • Composite Growth: English language arts and mathematics
  • Composite Graduation Rate: Four-, five-, and six-year graduation rates for high schools

Elevating indicators provide additional information and can raise, but not lower, the profile:

  • English Learner Progress: Student progress towards reaching English proficiency
  • Consistent Attendance: Students present for at least 90% of the school year
  • Climate Survey Participation: Student participation in the annual climate survey

Each indicator is evaluated separately using statewide performance criteria.

Indicator Performance Criteria

Illinois does not use percentage weights or combine indicators into a single weighted score. Instead, indicators have different roles in determining a school's profile. Core indicators — Proficiency, Growth, and Graduation Rate — carry more weight because they establish the foundation of the profile. Elevating indicators can raise a profile when specific criteria are met, but they cannot lower it.

English Learner Progress is also a federally required academic indicator; Consistent Attendance and Climate Survey Participation are state-selected measures of school quality and student success.

Each indicator and each overall Profile of Performance uses five performance levels. Because Profiles of Performance reflect multiple measures, there are multiple ways for a school to achieve the same overall performance level.

  • Exemplary: The highest levels of performance. Schools with an Exemplary overall profile demonstrate strong patterns of performance and have no student groups with a Comprehensive profile.
  • Approaching Exemplary: Patterns of strong performance approaching the highest levels. Schools with an Approaching Exemplary overall profile also have no student groups with a Comprehensive profile.
  • Commendable: Solid performance, with multiple possible patterns of strengths and areas for improvement. This is the highest overall profile a school can receive if any student group has a Comprehensive profile.
  • Developing: Patterns of performance showing greater need for improvement. Schools may have one or more student groups with a Comprehensive profile.
  • Comprehensive: Patterns reflecting particularly low Core performance. For Title I schools, a Comprehensive overall profile results in identification for Comprehensive Support and Improvement.

A school's overall performance level does not mean that every indicator is performing at that level. Different combinations of Core, Elevating, and student group performance can result in the same overall profile.

A school's profile is determined in three steps: Core Performance → Elevating Performance → Student Group Performance.

  1. Determine Core Performance. The strongest Core indicator generally establishes the starting point, subject to rules that ensure very low Core performance remains visible.
  2. Consider Elevating Performance. Strong Elevating performance may raise the profile by one level but cannot lower it.
  3. Consider Student Group Performance. If any student group has a Comprehensive profile, an otherwise Exemplary or Approaching Exemplary overall profile becomes Commendable.

Some Core indicators also have Automatic Comprehensive criteria that limit the extent to which stronger performance elsewhere can elevate a profile.

How a Profile Comes TogetherOfficial Summative Designation Business Rules

ESSA requires states to consider the performance of specific groups of students as well as all students combined. Illinois calculates Profiles of Performance for accountability student groups when there are enough records to produce an accountability result. The minimum group size, or n-size, is 20 records per indicator.

Student group performance is considered in determining the school's overall Profile of Performance and in identifying schools for targeted support.

Every Student Counts: Student Group Performance in Accountability

A school's Profile of Performance and its school improvement status are related but are not the same. Federal law establishes three levels of support:

  • Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI): Identifies at least the lowest-performing 5% of schools and certain other schools required by federal law.
  • Additional Targeted Support and Improvement (ATSI): Identifies schools with a student group performing at the same level as students in the lowest-performing schools.
  • Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI): Identifies schools with consistently underperforming student groups, using a state-defined standard, and is identified annually.

States can use the ATSI standard to define underperformance for TSI when identification occurs annually. Illinois uses an annual approach for all support levels. Illinois identifies TSI based on Comprehensive student group performance and identifies ATSI from within those schools using the same methodology used to determine CSI eligibility, and uses TSI to refer to both groups simultaneously, as the level of support and expectations are the same.

Schools generally have one planning year and up to three years of implementation to meet exit criteria. Schools that remain Comprehensive after completing the CSI improvement cycle receive more rigorous interventions through Intensive School Improvement.

Profiles of Performance and School Improvement StatusSchools Identified for Support

Long-Term Goals and Measures of Interim Progress

ESSA requires Illinois to establish long-term goals and measures of interim progress for all students and applicable student groups. Illinois reports goals and progress in:

  • Academic achievement: English language arts, mathematics, and science
  • Graduation: Four-, five-, and six-year graduation rates
  • English language proficiency: Progress toward English language proficiency

The long-term goals establish where Illinois expects performance to be over time. Measures of interim progress provide benchmarks for determining whether the state, districts, schools, and student groups are making progress toward those goals.

Illinois Long-Term Goals and Measures of Interim Progress

The Illinois Report Card serves two related purposes: public reporting and federal accountability. Because federal accountability rules establish specific requirements for which students and records are included in calculations, a value displayed for accountability may sometimes differ from a similar value reported elsewhere on the Report Card.

For example, Report Card data may describe all students served by a school, while accountability calculations may include only students who meet specific enrollment, grade, participation, or other eligibility requirements. Calculations based on the same student data can therefore produce different values without either value being incorrect.

Why Numbers May DifferPublic Business Rules for Report Card MetricsOfficial Summative Designation Business Rules
Learn More
An Overview of Profiles of PerformanceWhy Profiles of PerformanceBuilding a Profile of PerformanceHow to Read a Profile of PerformanceAccountability Indicators - Measure By MeasureWhy Student Group Performance MattersUnderstanding Student GrowthUsing Profiles for Continuous Improvement

MANHATTAN JR HIGH SCHOOL (6 - 8)

MANHATTAN SD 114

Current Principal

Mr. Vince Perillo

Current District Superintendent

Dr. Damien Aherne

Address

15414 W SMITH RD

MANHATTAN IL 60442

(815) 418-6299

Visit School Website
Download Historical School Report Cards
At-a-Glance PDF Report Card
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
ISBE Classic PDF Report Card
Loading....

Compare Schools

 

Basic Comparison

You select the schools, and this tool provides comparisons of Fast Facts, Academic Progress, and School Environment.

 

Advanced School Comparison

You select schools with similar factors and then see comparisons on several measures of School Characteristics, Test Performance, Demographics, and Finance.

Custom Report Card Builder

Make your selections and click "Generate Report"

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Student Attendance

This graph shows the average daily attendance at this school. Learn More 

 

Regular attendance is critical in ensuring excellent student performance. Students who do not attend school regularly may fall behind in one or more subjects, and may struggle to complete assignments.

  • Why Does Attendance Matter?

  • School Attendance Issues to Consider (Great Schools Article)

  • 10 Facts about School Attendance

  • The Importance of Being in School (A Report on Absenteeism)

 
 
 
 
 
 

Quick Links

  • Español
  • Help/FAQ
  • ISBE Classic PDF Search
  • Provide Feedback

Contact

100 N First Street Springfield, IL 62777

reportcard@isbe.net

ISBE Seal Logo Footer
© 2026 Illinois State Board of Education